Thursday, March 21, 2013

Rule of law

 I have learned that the new use patent does not cover sampling because when you sample you are now copying and distributing copies to the public. This can cause harm financially to the copyright owner. There is also a chance that you took a larger amount of the originals work.  “Fair use is the right to copy a portion of a copyrighted work without permission because your use is for a limited purpose, such as for educational use in a classroom or to comment upon, criticize, or parody the work being sampled”. This helps you to defend a claim that you infringed and also if you alter a sample so that a random regular person cannot hear any apparent similarities between your work and the sample, there's no violation of the law. The court looks at the money damage how you transformed the sample and how much you took in the view of fair use. The myth that less than two seconds is not true some courts apply this fair use rule only to the musical composition.

Own Argument and Opinions


I have found a new side to the law through this project. As a musician i have a lot of things to protect when i start my creation and bring it out to the world. When i called my lawyer i was really nervous but after we talked for a while i could see that it was not as big of a deal as i was making it. She was very polite and answered my questions in a serious way. I have now taken another step in the knowledge i will need in the future. I also now know the value in having a good lawyer for the more subjective cases. There are a lot of "it depends" when it comes to the law. Knowing the deference is the key to staying out of court and keeping the rights to your work. This new found information will also keep me from being attacked by patent-trolls  I see cases of people being attacked over a two second loop that started there song and I would never want that to happen to me. Through this new experience I have gained a new view on the way i create and protect what I have. I no longer see it as just a mark by a name or a piece of paper. I know now that it is a shield that gives me the right to go after anyone that tries to claim what it is that I took the time to create and produce. I now have the ability to say with confidence that I now what a copyright is what a patent and what a trademark is. I am also proud to say I know how to obtain all three. The fail safe of them may not stop anyone from infringing but it does allow me to fight.

Questions


I have had a lot of worry about have to avoid infringement in the creation of my music. The true concern comes from when I begin to start sampling others work to create something new.  In this direction I have ask questions accordingly to how I go about doing these things.

1.    Would sample a song be move under the new use clause and protect me from infringement?
2.    Can I be attacked for creating in the same style as someone else?
3.    How far does a copyrighted song go as far as licensing use of that a song, can I control how it is used?
4.    How do you go about getting a license for a song of someone who isn’t living anymore?
5.    Can I protect a new design for a guitars body as the guitar or does it have to have its own separate patent because the other parts of it are already made in other guitars?
6.    If I’m hired to do a job to make and record a score how would I go about making a contract so my music stays mines so.
7.    How do you know how much royalties is supposed to be given for a project?
8.    How would I go about becoming a published musician?
9.    How would I be affected after using an abandoned phrase or a common one in my music?
10.  What are some things that  I can use in my music as In references certain lines ect.?

Law Authority


My lawyer was Leanne Dodds. She has 16 years of experience and has a license to practice in Arizona and Nevada. She graduated from Arizona State University with a JD in Law and from California State University with a BA in Psychology. I found her through a website I found on the internet while I was searching intellectual property lawyers for this project. I trust her I choose her out of the others because she was the only one to pick up the phone. I want through at least 20 people before I was able to get to her number. Thankfully she was there to help me out. She treated me as an adult and answered my questions to the best of her ability. Another reason is because her advice was free. She works in business law intellectual property landlord tenant real estate law and trademarks.  With her experience and knowledge I felt that it was a good choice to ask her my questions dealing as I deal closely with music and I cannot afford to be sued. Also I felt more comfortable talking to a woman about my interest in the workings of the law. She has all the requirements to help me and answer my questions.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

EOC Week 10 Lawyer Jokes


Q: What's the difference between a female lawyer and a pitbull?
A: Lipstick.

Q: What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 100?
A: Your Honor.

Q: What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 50
A: Senator.

A lawyer calls his client to tell him about his fee schedule.

"Alright," the lawyer says looking through his papers. "You owe me $1000 down and $417.58 cents each month for the next thirty-six months.

"What! That sounds like a car payment schedule," retorted the client.

"Your right. It's mine."

Question: Do you know how to save five drowning lawyers? Answer: No. Reply: Good!

How can you tell the difference between an attorney lying dead in the road and a coyote lying dead in the road? With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.

How many lawyers does it take to screw in a light bulb? How many can you afford?

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Week 8 EOC: Bratz VS Mattel


Bratz and Barbie are two big names in the toy industry with a long lasting family feud that has been dragged out for almost a year.  These brands have made their mark on the world with their many figurines movies videogames songs posters products that have been sold worldwide. These memory making icon in the hands and homes for millions of little girls around the world have been in a struggle to prove who exactly really owns the rights to the “Bratz” brand. Mattel has spent large sums of money in this fight to claim what they believe is their own property. You can tell by a long distance the difference between the much loved dolls and the difference in the attitude that where given to the in the creation so what makes Mattel think it is rightfully theirs to own in retrospect to this undeniable fact. Most see the conflict as a huge waste of money on the part of the larger rival Mattel. “The rehearing of the first where, in 2008, a jury concluded that Barbie doll clothing designer Carter Bryant was under contract to Mattel when he came up with the initial design for the Bratz dolls. The jury awarded Mattel $100 million, and the trial judge ruled that the Bratz franchise was the property of Mattel.”( ANN ZIMMERMAN)  this was the one of the victories of Mattel which was to later get overturned which Mattel continued this back and forth between the two. This leaving the owner of the brand up in the air.

Week 8 BOC: Status


In my final I a straight forward plan to get everything I need to complete and be informed on issues that concerns me directly. I plan to draw up questions related to music creation and infringement on things like sampling or a voice over in retrospect of a speech being put in or even names that are mention in a song. These are the type of things I want to know. I have not specifically found a lawyer yet but I have a few promising ones that I am close to getting answers from. My blog is still on track but my tweets are still far behind which I plan to make up as soon as possible. Everything other than that is on par with where I should be. The schedule I put on the final leaves me finishing up early and free to get the rest of my work finished for this class. I am confident everything will be done in a timely manner and that there is nothing else that can be a hindrance too my productivity. Everything is set in order and there is nothing else to cover. This is my current status for this week of class.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

EOC Week 7 Lawyers

Preston Sterling Kerr 702-608-0835
Dillon G. Coil            702-658-6100
Mark Borghese         702-382-0200
Neil B. Shouse          702-380-4895
Mitchell  S. Bisson     702-385-3343
John Rizvi                  702-997-1826
Tiffany Swanis           702-862-3300
Brooke Bohlke          702-385-3343
William Wray             702-792-7000
Leanne Dodds            702-949-8272


Thursday, February 14, 2013

EOC Week 6 Illicit Trading


There are many different opinions on the illicit trading. There have been a lot of arguments for it and the cause of this epidemic and why it is both bad and good. Illicit trading boost the economy for certain countries while it also provides the demand for things that are out of our reach as people on the lower end of the totem pole financially. But this is not the issue that is concerning in which is the in between that has been open for the less behaved Samaritans that has taken advantage of the trade for more malice deed in drugs weapons and trafficking this in itself becoming a product of mass destruction to our society and cripples our control over what goes to whose hands. This action in itself complicates the world of business as we see it. We continue to give in to these dark angels who gives us what we want in demand fulfilling manner and becomes a power in which we cannot grasp fully or hope to regain a foothold onto it. In audio countless forms of pirating have been established to contribute to crippling the amount someone can live off of in this profession. That means movies music sound effects speeches scripts trademarks are up for grabs in this whirlpool of a mess that is no open to anyone with the knowledge to obtain it. Nothing is safe but everything is protected, we can safe guard our things but it doesn't stop the cycle of distribution that is theft on our creative identity. Then where do we point the finger for when it is time to collect when there is millions and millions of people taking and copying and redistributing different types of works. Where does it end and where does it start for us to become a safe entity 

Thursday, January 24, 2013

EOC Week 3 Jepordy


100. This U.S. Supreme Court case ruled that the judge rather than the jury is responsible for the claims in a patent infringement case. What is Markman v. Westview Instruments?
200. Because of this once a patent item is sold it is not an infringement to resell it. What is  Exhaustion?
300.  In 1966, this Supreme Court case created the guidelines for determining when an invention is nonobvious. What is  Graham v. John Deere?

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Week 2 EOC: Erin Brockovich


Erin Brockovich gives a very black and white look on how the legal game is played and how it is easily manipulated with to force a outcome. Lawyers like take things like sympathy and are able to either reverse or use it to their own advantage. They twist facts in their favor to get the disarm conclusion to receive the hefty fine at the end of the cycle which is the legal system as a whole.  We embrace the help of these highly educated people but for what service is the large lump sum of a settlement worth to where in a lot of cases it’s not even worth it. Then in all reality, there are the big corporations that you fight against in this which have a literal army of lawyers at their beck and call to drag out the processes if need be or strong or strong arm some with the fear of the weight the person their suing holds. In the movie they built a case and was able to acquire 333 million dollars(http://www.brockovich.com/mystory.html) for the 600 residents but the held the 40 percent of the profits that totaled 133200000 dollars for the firm.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Week 1 EOC: My Voice


As a Professional in audio engineering, I have held myself to a standard of reliability as I perfect my work in all fields of audio. I do voice overs music composition live sound studio musician video shooting and video editing. I can do all genres and projects in soudscaping and sound design. I strive for perfection into my work which continues of my look for perfection in all sessions and projects. Though my extensive education i am complete confidence into every project that I acquire and on my zero tolerance and dedication allows me to be punctual and on time in all endeavors. Through my discipline in music and dedication to becoming professional and efficient i have been shaped to perform at an optimum expectancy of performance to become a most contributable part of the audio field. With a active mind I always pull forward into the unknown into my work into bring about the best projects. I believe n integrity and responsibility in all aspects of life. It takes a lot to give you all into a cause and profession and you have to put your whole heart into. I refuse to do things half way and see things half done. I strive for perfection and continue to do so as I go farther into the field of audio and the knowledge that I continue to grow and learn from more experiences.